At FORUM-ASIA, we employ a range of strategies to effectively achieve our goals and create a lasting impact.

Through a diverse array of approaches, FORUM-ASIA is dedicated to achieving our objectives and leaving a lasting imprint on human rights advocacy.

Who we work with

Our interventions are meticulously crafted and ready to enact tangible change, addressing pressing issues and empowering communities.

Each statements, letters, and publications are meticulously tailored, poised to transform challenges into opportunities, and to empower communities towards sustainable progress.

Multimedia Stories
publications

With a firm commitment to turning ideas into action, FORUM-ASIA strives to create lasting change that leaves a positive legacy for future generations.

Explore our dedicated sub-sites to witness firsthand how FORUM-ASIA turns ideas into action, striving to create a legacy of lasting positive change for future generations.

Subscribe our monthly e-newsletter

TIMOR LESTE: Draft penal code needs final adjustment

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin

According to Dili-based Justice System Monitoring Programme (JSMP), a new Penal Code draft will be slated soon for review by the National Parliament. It appears to address most of the criticisms levelled at earlier attempts by civil society.

Such a law would list all offences in criminal law in Timor-Leste. In accordance with The United Nations Transitional Administration in East Timor regulation, the country presently refers to pre-existing Indonesian statutes.

The Indonesian penal code has been decried as departing from international human rights norms on a number of fronts, not least in its treatment of gender-based violence.

A new Timorese law is needed not only to correct these shortcomings, but also to ensure that Timor-Leste’s social and political structures are appropriately reflected.

It is a welcome progress to find that in the most recent draft obtained by JSMP, provisions in respect of domestic abuse and sexual violence are vastly improved.

Unlike its predecessor, the draft would allow prosecution of rape within marriage, and considers cohabitation to be an aggravating, rather than mitigating, factor in assaults.

JSMP also applauds revisions that effectively decriminalise abortion in certain cases, such as where the physical or mental health of the mother would otherwise be at risk.

These fortunate legislative advances are tarnished, though, by the persistent inclusion of criminal defamation provisions despite previous, vocal opposition on this point.

Creation of such an offence would, in some cases, penalize public comments critical of the state, its policies or representatives. This would inevitably limit press freedoms.

Similar provisions, enacted in other Asian nations such as Cambodia and Singapore, have proved a powerful tool for quashing dissent and engendering a compliant media.

In an emerging democracy such as Timor-Leste, with its legacy of injustices and its nascent institutions, criminal defamation would have an especially damaging effect.

JSMP understands that both the Minister of Justice and the UN have now suggested that criminal defamation be removed from the draft to be debated in Parliament.

It is hoped that sustained pressure will avoid the adoption of such an authoritarian and undemocratic device in what would otherwise be a great advance for law in Timor.