At FORUM-ASIA, we employ a range of strategies to effectively achieve our goals and create a lasting impact.

Through a diverse array of approaches, FORUM-ASIA is dedicated to achieving our objectives and leaving a lasting imprint on human rights advocacy.

Who we work with

Our interventions are meticulously crafted and ready to enact tangible change, addressing pressing issues and empowering communities.

Each statements, letters, and publications are meticulously tailored, poised to transform challenges into opportunities, and to empower communities towards sustainable progress.

Multimedia Stories

With a firm commitment to turning ideas into action, FORUM-ASIA strives to create lasting change that leaves a positive legacy for future generations.

Explore our dedicated sub-sites to witness firsthand how FORUM-ASIA turns ideas into action, striving to create a legacy of lasting positive change for future generations.

Subscribe our monthly e-newsletter

HRC48 Joint Oral Statement on Item 3: Interactive dialogue with the Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth, justice, reparation and guarantees of non-recurrence

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin

 48th regular session of the UN Human Rights Council

Item 3: Interactive dialogue with the Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth, justice, reparation and guarantees of non-recurrence

Delivered by Taisuke Komatsu of IMADR

On behalf of Amnesty International, Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM-ASIA), and the International Movement against All Forms of Discrimination and Racism (IMADR)

16 September 2021

Madam President,

We thank the Special Rapporteur for presenting the follow-up report on Sri Lanka. The response of the Government of Sri Lanka (GoSL) fails to share a concrete action plan to address the challenges identified by the Special Rapporteur. Almost all the activities of the Office on Missing Persons (OMP) described in the response were implemented by former Commissioners who completed their mandate in February this year. The word ‘transitional justice’ is no longer in the vocabulary of the government and we note trends towards reversing the process under the current administration.

We affirm the need to have independent mechanisms to seek truth, justice, and reparations. This is not possible in Sri Lanka today with the removal of an independent nomination and appointment process for such mechanisms. The rejection of Resolution 30/1 and the appointment of Commissioners handpicked by the President to the OMP has given rise to fear and suspicion among the victims who are seeking redress for grave violations. Moreover, no information about new OMP Commissioners is available on its website[1] at the time this statement is recorded. Victims are unable to contact the OMP while the payment of interim relief to victim families has stopped along with the issuance of Certificates of Absence. Based on recent comments made on the International Day of the Disappeared, the Office seems intent on reducing the case load rather than seeking out the truth around the circumstances in which people have disappeared and fulfilling its mandate. Meanwhile, the former Foreign Minister Dinesh Gunawardena stated last month that hundreds of those disappeared during the armed conflict were living abroad, without providing any evidence, and the Minister requested information from countries based on the lists of missing persons compiled by the OMP.[2] Such actions raise a serious concern to the safety and security of families of the disappeared who have engaged with the OMP.

Shrinking civil society space, arbitrary detention under the draconian Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA), the militarisation of civilian administrative functions of the government and the total disregard of minority rights during the COVID-19 pandemic require serious attention from the international community. Despite its assertion to cooperate with UN human rights mechanisms, Sri Lanka has failed to submit its initial report to the UN Committee on Enforced Disappearances (CED) since its ratification in 2016.

Recommendations of the Presidential Commissions of Inquiry on “political victimisation” and Easter Sunday attacks have raised serious doubts in relation to accountability. Against this backdrop, we call on the Special Rapporteur and this Council to extend full support for the implementation of Resolution 46/1.

Thank you.




For a PDF version of this statement, click here