At FORUM-ASIA, we employ a range of strategies to effectively achieve our goals and create a lasting impact.

Through a diverse array of approaches, FORUM-ASIA is dedicated to achieving our objectives and leaving a lasting imprint on human rights advocacy.

Who we work with

Our interventions are meticulously crafted and ready to enact tangible change, addressing pressing issues and empowering communities.

Each statements, letters, and publications are meticulously tailored, poised to transform challenges into opportunities, and to empower communities towards sustainable progress.

Multimedia Stories

With a firm commitment to turning ideas into action, FORUM-ASIA strives to create lasting change that leaves a positive legacy for future generations.

Explore our dedicated sub-sites to witness firsthand how FORUM-ASIA turns ideas into action, striving to create a legacy of lasting positive change for future generations.

Subscribe our monthly e-newsletter

ANNI Members Update, Korean House for International Solidarity (KHIS) – South Korea

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin

Korean Human Rights NGOs sent a selection criterion for the Chairperson of the National Human Rights Commission of Korea’s Candidate Recommendation Committee

Human Rights NGOs formed a round table at the end of May to appoint the next Chairperson of National Human Rights Comission Korea (NHRCK)  in accordance with the international human rights norms andto provide a venue for civil   the nominating process. They passed the principles and standards on the nomination of candidates to the Presidential Office and NHRCK on the 12th of June.

In addition, the round table held a survey asking 60 human rights activists on the qualifications, criteria, and roles of the next Chairperson for five consecutive days from 25th. The result will be passed on to Candidate Recommendation Committee and the candidates.

The 5 questions were:

Question 1. What type of person do you prefer for a Chairperson?

Question 2. What type of person do you not prefer for a Chairperson?

Question 3. What should be considered as the first priority in the selection of the Chairperson?

Question 4. What are the human rights issues that need to be addressed by the next Chairperson?

Question 5. In what way should NHRCK be changed afterwards?

According to the round table, the words frequently mentioned for Question 1 were ‘minority movement,’ ‘anti-discrimination law enactment,’ ‘independence from power,’and ‘communication with civil society.’

In addition, for Question 2, the activists displeased male legal professions (all the previous Chairpersons happened to be male legal professions), people who previously worked as senior officers, politicians and businessmen (it has a higher possibility of being influenced by the government and business sector), people with no understanding of minorities, people with religious prejudices, and people who depend too much on professionalism.

The frequently mentioned agendas that the next Chairperson should pay attention to (Question 4) were the enactment of the Anti-Discrimination Act, rights of sexual minorities, women, refugees, the disabled, migrants, and the right to work. Besides, abolition of capital punishment and abortion, social rights, and the implementation of the recommendations by the International Human Rights Committee were also recommended.

An official of the round table said ‘it is necessary for NHRCK to innovate and strengthen its capacity, as the activists have expressed the need that NHRCK be an independent human rights committee, actively respond to human rights issues, and communicate with the civil society on the side of the minorities.’The official concluded‘we want NHRCK to play a role in raising issues of anti-human rights practices in Korea by actively determining and criticising discrimination beyond legal boundaries without being afraid of criticisms.’